Covers a range of topics relating to mortgages and the wider housing market.
Covers issues relating to savings accounts and payments.
Covers developments in conduct of business regulation
Covers issues relating to the corporate governance and constitution of building societies.
People related matters such as talent development, apprenticeships and diversity.
Internal and external accounting assurance and matters relating to tax.
The regulation and supervision of firms to ensure their safety and soundness under the remit of the Prudential Regulation Authority.
A new legal aid scheme to support borrowers at risk of repossession (member only content).
A wide range of statistics relating to the UK mortgage and housing markets.
Research, analysis and guidance about our members and the issues that affect them.
Retail savings data including net receipts and deposits, ISAs and interest rates.
Operational and financial information about building societies. Includes AGM & financial results and remuneration details.
Submission and publication deadlines for BSA data and reports.
Mortgage approvals pick up & further cut to Bank Rate expected this year.
News and views on topical issues from the BSA and guests.
View our latest press releases and comment here.
The BSA's quarterly magazine covers whats happening in the world of building societies, credit unions and the wider financial services sector.
A quarterly survey that assesses consumer sentiment regarding the UK property market.
View biographies and download photos of the BSA's key spokespeople
BSA speeches from events and seminars
View the latest webinars, training and other events open to members, associates and other stakeholders
View our latest BSA Annual Conference and comment here.
View our latest Past events & summaries and comment here.
Learn how to promote your event to the BSA's membership.
Treasury management training for credit unions (28th November 2024)
Find factsheets on mortgages, savings and the building society sector.
Track building societies that no longer exists and get a link to its successor's website.
Find mortgage instructions and specific requirements setting out individual building society policies.
The UK Savings Week campaign aims to get people engaged in saving.
Toolkits to develop Workplace Savings are available here.
Here you can find our publications, responses to consultation documents, mortgage instructions, statistics and sector job vacancies.
Find out more about the BSA and the sector.
Contact details for each of our 49 members.
Our Associate members include a wide range of companies from insurers, banks, accountants, solicitors, and other business suppliers to BSA members.
The National Credit Union Forum (NCUF) is the Credit Union Committee of the BSA.
View biographies and download photos of our key spokespeople
Vacancies for senior management, executive and other positions at the BSA and its member organisations
Find out the wide range of benefits of joining the BSA as an associate member.
The Building Societies Association is the voice of the UK's building societies.
This month, Paul Broadhead, BSA's Head of Mortgage & Housing Policy, focuses on the PRA's consultation on Basel 3.1 and how some of the proposed changes can have a number of unintended consequences.
Paul is Head of Mortgage & Housing policy at the BSA. This article was first published in Mortgage Finance Gazette.
For the last three months, I along with some of my colleagues, have been reviewing the Prudential Regulation Authority’s (PRA) Consultation on Basel 3.1. At 1,400 pages, it’s not a quick read!
In simple terms the Basel capital standards are intended to strengthen the risk management of banks, by setting out the amount of capital they need to hold against the risks they take. Changes in how Basel rules are implemented, from legislation to the PRA’s Rulebook, has provided the regulator with an opportunity to consult on the standards and how they are applied.
Overall, we welcome this review and support the direction of travel the PRA is taking, not least its intention to introduce more proportionality, which is critical for smaller firms, such as many building societies.
But as with all complex frameworks, some of the proposed changes can have a number of unintended consequences, and it’s important that we highlight these early to avoid distortion in the market, unnecessarily higher costs and/or detrimental impact on consumers.
It’s important to note that the Basel standards only apply to PRA-regulated banks and not the non-bank lenders. Therefore, some changes could very well have a distorting effect on competition, and potentially push some consumers to alternative lenders, and we need to ensure the PRA remains alert to this.
Within the new proposals, three areas that have particularly caught our attention as requiring further thought and consideration are:
The proposals suggest that properties should be re-valued when a borrower requires a re-mortgage product switch, which we completely agree with. However, there is a lack of clarity given on the methodologies that will be acceptable. We need certainty that current market practices, which include a combination of physical valuations, desk top assessment, automated valuation tools and HPI indexation, which are applied depending on the risk, can remain.
We believe that lenders adopt a level of conservatism when applying automated valuation techniques compared to physical valuations, meaning the likelihood of properties that have been assessed using these methods being over-valued and under-capitalised are extremely low.
In the Consultation, the PRA has proposed a significantly higher risk weighting (3.5x higher) for self-build mortgages compared to other properties. Our data shows that these mortgages typically experience lower arrears and loss rates than we see on standard residential properties – despite what Kevin McCloud might tell us on Grand Designs!
Self-build borrowers generally build a home that is far more energy efficient than other properties and so to apply penal capital treatment on this type of lending would be counter to the government’s climate change and net zero ambitions. Also, with the self-build sector accounting for approx. 15,000 new homes a year, which would rank it as a top five housing developer in the UK, deterring lenders from being active in this market could also have a significant impact on the government’s new homes targets too.
Within the new proposals, lending to buy-to-let landlords with (up to three) properties can be carried out using the risk-weightings that apply to standard residential mortgages, as these landlords are not considered to be materially dependent on the income from their properties. Higher capital requirements, and therefore higher mortgage costs, are proposed for those with more properties. The challenge will be for lenders to find out how many other properties a borrower has at any given time.
There have been a number of recent changes negatively impacting buy-to-let landlords, most notably a reduction in the tax relief on mortgage finance. Other changes that are likely to hit many landlords financially are also coming down the line, such as the requirement to bring the energy efficiency of properties to EPC Rating A-C. These changes are already starting to show signs of impacting the housing market, as some landlords exit the market or offload less energy efficient properties. We want the PRA to exercise caution, and base any changes to the capital treatment for lending on these properties on facts, in this particularly sensitive area of the market.
It's not too late for changes to be made, the deadline for consultation responses is 31 March. We’re putting our thoughts together, which will quite simply be around the message that to grow the economy, the housing and mortgage markets need to be competitive and operate smoothly, and that requires a proportionate approach to the regulatory rules.
This webinar will cover a summary of the Employment Rights Bill, with a focus on the proposed changes that will affect Building Societies in particula...
The BSA strongly supports the principle of charging a fee to CMCs.
Our response to FCA GC23-2